From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 7 09:18:31 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1509CEEC34C for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (www.covisp.net [65.121.55.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93007E8BF for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: LuKreme Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:18:28 -0700 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation Message-Id: References: <20180206222137.GA78935@skeletor.feld.me> In-Reply-To: <20180206222137.GA78935@skeletor.feld.me> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15E5178f) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:18:31 -0000 On Feb 6, 2018, at 15:21, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 > After your recent harassment of OpenBSD (https://github.com/jasperla/openb= sd-wip/issues/86) I decided to investigate our own packaging of Palemoon. As= expected, we are also building against system libraries. You can review our= build log here: Huh. I would have nuked the port after about the 5th post in that thread. Yo= u=E2=80=99re a very patient person, and Matt is... well. I can=E2=80=99t say= anything nice, so... --=20 This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.=