From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Mar 24 5:24:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378FE37B400 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 05:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA15055; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:24:25 +1100 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:24:47 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Mark Murray Cc: Subject: Re: Why isn't __progname declared in a header? In-Reply-To: <200203241141.g2OBfZXl019225@grimreaper.grondar.org> Message-ID: <20020325001528.B44805-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > __progname is (inconsistently) declared all over the place. Why is > this not in a header? Because all over the place is unwarrantedly chummy with the implementation. __progname should only be used in csu/*/crt1.c, getprogname(3), setprogname(3) and perhaps in other parts of the implementation. > Next question, what header should it go into? I'm quite happy to do > the work. libc/include/libc_private.h is almost right. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message