From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 05:07:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2FE16A482 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309CD43D45 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:07:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix, from userid 20000) id BFB31684A26; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (postfix [127.0.0.3]) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B119A684A24 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.3]) by localhost (postfix.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 84542-06-2 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loki.starkstrom.lan (p549CD973.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.217.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2531A684A1F for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:11 +0200 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060623070711.04c5bf94@loki.starkstrom.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <1150853032.16507.1.camel@localhost> <0578D634449883E0B7478DE4@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.3 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_gp1I4V=eXu/XNEk7n962yHm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 449b770c885481488287631 X-DSPAM-User: global Subject: Re: FreeBSD smp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:07:26 -0000 --Sig_gp1I4V=eXu/XNEk7n962yHm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:51:46 -0500 (CDT) Denny White wrote: > Okay, might be off base here, so someone correct me if > I'm wrong. Don't you also have to remove the following >=20 > #ifdef SMP > #ifndef COMPILING_LINT > #error DEVICE_POLLING is not compatible with SMP > #endif > #endif >=20 > from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c ? >=20 > You'll get an error part of the way through building > the kernel otherwise, right? Like I said, that's the > way I remember it. Just trying to save someone some > unnecessary work. Obviously only if you have enabled device polling in your custom kernel and know what you're doing. Defaulting to refuse to build polling on SMP has its reason. While it is generally not a problem, the kernel / userland ratio and statistics code might get messed up if I recall an old posting from Luigi correctly. Joerg --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_gp1I4V=eXu/XNEk7n962yHm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEm3cJH31s/bvKrSQRAqaqAJ9LXCUdfjWiAUWQyQrhhcsy8nlHqgCfY4Uz XVVAOqmkoUZAGYBKyYCCHhs= =H37m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_gp1I4V=eXu/XNEk7n962yHm--