From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Wed Sep  9 13:39:21 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246BAA005BC
 for <freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Sep 2015 13:39:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu)
Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023981309
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Sep 2015 13:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu)
Received: from c-66-41-25-68.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([66.41.25.68]
 helo=[192.168.0.107])
 by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
 (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <allan@physics.umn.edu>)
 id 1ZZfao-000BT0-U7
 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:39:19 -0500
Subject: Re: CEPH + FreeBSD
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
References: <CANw0z+VhYCPNWrjByXLf8yO9wA0sc05_8eVJsM-McjcGNU9KQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANw0z+XrwK=6y+Lpoiewc_eLDBYB5UZ5XpU6-YP0-K2FKwSa5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <A19FDEB5-1DEF-4EBF-8E9E-A1AD4688F1AA@icloud.com>
 <100306673.40344407.1441279047901.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca>
 <1564D4FA-9BE1-4E37-8E91-F14A009D6B62@icloud.com>
 <838814506.1858817.1441577912291.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca>
 <F5F89A87-AD10-4CD3-BF56-854EEBB4C121@longcount.org>
 <CAKYr3zyPxM0oKhgsNoFmkFxn6AFkekS2=ptV7Z6CicTzZvXCdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <488408636.4345946.1441801224232.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca>
From: Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu>
Message-ID: <55F03688.6060407@physics.umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:39:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <488408636.4345946.1441801224232.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:39:21 -0000

On 9/9/2015 7:20 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> If there are yet more of these cluster object stores that you think might be worth
> considering, feel free to mention them. (I thought I had looked at most of them, but
> hadn't noticed MooseFS, so...)

Not adding anything new, but I found this an interesting paper comparing 
some of the contenders.

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789086/document

I felt glusterfs seems like it would be the fastest and easiest to get 
up and running (at least on linux).

Graham