From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 2 20:34:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE1E16A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E943D31 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bfoz@terrandev.com) Received: from terrandev.com (c-24-6-52-207.client.comcast.net[24.6.52.207]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040603033440015005mop3e> (Authid: bfoz); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 03:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: <40BE9C52.6060108@terrandev.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 20:34:42 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Harr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot boot system built today X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 03:34:41 -0000 Lee Harr wrote: > Just out of curiosity, I burned a 4.10-RELEASE cd and tried > booting that. It boots in to sysinstall normally! > > So, now... what could be the difference that allows the cd to boot, but > not the same kernel booting from the hard drive? I just tried the same thing, except that I blew away by old installation first. Install finished normally, but on the first reboot it hung up on the IDE stuff again. Since I'm dual booting with win2k I decided to replace the ancient bootsect.bsd file I had been using with /boot/boot1 from the livefs cd (disc2). Same results. Now what? Its weird how it will boot from the cd w/o problem but it barfs from the hard drive. I don't have a non-dual boot machine to try...I wonder if that's the problem. Has anybody filed a PR for this yet?