Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:20:07 -0700 From: Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: unsupported ZFS version 5000 (should be 28) Message-ID: <CAPyBAS4ELa_w7Zm3JKcrqH9EvohRP6%2BMOuqDc3p9i=i1gdPpjg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOFF%2BZ2ff8%2BwPQBR6YM2n9vX8qsZoq_VWXVHFKXB5qWp11Hddg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyBAS6Sf-5-HF%2BVGGZN1bp2Q2YebF5=Aw_Qj0OTED8oppk6SA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOFF%2BZ2ff8%2BwPQBR6YM2n9vX8qsZoq_VWXVHFKXB5qWp11Hddg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> the other option you have is 9.2 BETA, I think that has feature flags > support I downloaded a 9.2-BETA ISO and booted the Live CD. That CD recognized the zpool and I was able to access the data. Then I did a "gpart bootcode" using the pmbr and gptzfsboot from the 9.2-BETA disk and rebooted, but it still wouldn't boot - same error about incorrect zpool version. I rebooted using the Live CD again into single user mode, and then imported the zpool int and mounted the root partition, and then did a "gpart bootcode" using pmbr and gptzfsroot from the OS that exists on the zpool and rebooted again, and that didn't work - same error message again. I'm starting to think that my "gpart bootcode" command is incorrect. I've been using: gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 And then re-run that for each of da1 through da5, to install the boot code on each. (I don't know if that helps or not, but it's a habit of mine, in case a drive dies in the future). Is that the right command to run for this? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyBAS4ELa_w7Zm3JKcrqH9EvohRP6%2BMOuqDc3p9i=i1gdPpjg>