From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Nov 26 13:33:51 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA03029
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 13:33:51 -0800
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA03017
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 13:33:27 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id NAA28680; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 13:33:02 -0800
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 13:33:02 -0800
Message-Id: <199511262133.NAA28680@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: peter@jhome.DIALix.COM
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951126230042.13407U-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> (message from Peter Wemm on Sun, 26 Nov 1995 23:03:24 +0800 (WST))
Subject: Re: Repository copy request: ports/utils -> ports/misc
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Ye gods..  There are a lot of dead animals^H^H^H^H^H^Hdirectories in 
 * utils.  Unless somebody yells otherwise, I think I'll delete the old 
 * empty directories first, that should make things easier.

Sure sure, go ahead.  The largest reason why we don't put release tags
on the ports tree is so that you can do these stuff! :)

Satoshi