From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 08:48:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F69106567D; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (pittgoth.com [205.134.163.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19698FC0C; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost.fbsdsecure.org (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7M8mtqa040211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:48:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:48:45 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Hiroki Sato Message-Id: <20080822044845.32c78713.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080822.160835.262777180.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <48A75B1A.7060809@FreeBSD.org> <20080817.204750.78468138.hrs@allbsd.org> <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20080822.160835.262777180.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pgj@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, gabor@kovesdan.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, simon@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/policies chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:48:57 -0000 On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:08:35 +0900 (JST) Hiroki Sato wrote: > "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote > in <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk>: > > si> I have no general problem with merging www and doc closer (might be > si> done while considering moving to svn?) and fully requiring having both > si> for build of either, but having e.g. www/en as a deep subdir of doc/ > si> seems like a rather bad idea to me. > si> > si> The web site and and doc/ are rather differnet beast wrt. how you > si> write content so I see no problem having it in seperate top level > si> directories. > > I agree with characteristics of www and doc are different from each > other, but I personally feel there is almost no difference between > having them in two separated dirs and having them in a dir. The > reason why I like to have www in a subdir of doc is only for simplify > the current build complexity due to the separated repos, so I am > wondering how other people feel for having www in a subdir like > doc//htdocs. I'm in favor. -- Tom Rhodes