From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 29 14:31:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (gatekeeper.orem.verio.net [192.41.0.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DBE37B43C for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:31:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from proxy.dmz.orem.verio.net (proxy.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.11]) by gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620963BF11F for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 15:31:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from shade.nectar.com (unknown [10.2.129.63]) by proxy.dmz.orem.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1977C004 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 15:31:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by shade.nectar.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4TLVWQ00565; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:31:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:31:32 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Chris Knight Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nsswitch progress Message-ID: <20010529163131.C461@shade.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Chris Knight , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20010528183714.C3857@shade.nectar.com> <067201c0e881$82f62ad0$020aa8c0@aims.private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <067201c0e881$82f62ad0$020aa8c0@aims.private>; from chris@aims.com.au on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM +1000 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > If someone with commit privs is interested, I have a set of patches based on > the 4.1-STABLE patches that apply cleanly to 4.3. This should be slightly > quicker to merge with -STABLE. Are these patches equivalent to the functionality in -CURRENT (i.e. straight port of the NetBSD code: files, NIS, Hesiod only)? Or are they based on what is found on my web page today (i.e. prototype with dynamic linking, reentrant interfaces, nss_ldap support)? If the former, I wouldn't mind if they were committed if the rest of the world wants it. If the latter, that should not be committed to -STABLE under any circumstances, and probably not to -CURRENT either (else I would have done it, instead of putting it off until I could complete the work). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message