From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 10 05:25:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA01813 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 05:25:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.org (PEAK.ORG [198.68.22.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA01807 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 05:25:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cov@peak.org) Received: from eric (midgard-17.PEAK.ORG [198.68.22.81]) by peak.org (8.8.5/8.6.7) with SMTP id FAA21817; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 05:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810101225.FAA21817@peak.org> X-Sender: cov@peak.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.63 (Beta) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 05:24:12 -0700 To: cov@peak.org From: Eric Hake Subject: Re: Stupid Subnet Question... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:18 AM 10/10/98 -0700, you wrote: >Ok, I'm a lame-o, but I'm stuck... For the record, I'm not a lame-o, just slow on the uptake :) It turns out that my problem is actually upstream in my router. I put a too-specific subnet into the Ethernet 0 portion of the router, which excluded the subnets downstream. The problem was solved by changing the following lines: Cisco> enable Cisco# conf t Cisco(config)# int e0 Cisco(config-int)# no ip address 10.10.138.221 255.255.255.240 Cisco(config-int)# no ip address 10.10.138.221 255.255.255.192 Cisco(config-int)# exit Cisco(config)# exit Cisco# write t Changing the Netmask to a less specific mask opened up the routing to the whole net block... If I'm missing something, I'm willing gain clue if you're willing to give it... Eric > >I have a HP Switch (224T), and I have an IP block that I have subnetted as >follows: > >10.10.138.192, netmask 255.255.255.240 >10.10.138.208, netmask 255.255.255.240 >10.10.138.224, netmask 255.255.255.224 > >Here's my problem -- > >I have my router at 10.10.130.221, and my switch at 10.10.130.220. I have >my switch set up as follows: > > 10.10.138.220, Netmask 255.255.255.240 > >I have my web server at 10.10.138.209 and 10.10.138.210, and my switch is >in the same subnet... > >My problem is when I try to create a virtual IP based host in the next >subnet, 10.10.138.224, Netmask 255.255.255.224, let's say with an IP >address of 10.10.138.227. My switch won't route to it (of course), and if >you do a traceroute from the outside to one of the virtuals IP addresses, >it comes in over the frame relay, hits our router, and then loops back >around again and again... > >I don't know how to get more than one subnet routed to my virtuals, over my >switch... I know it's a basic and probably pretty lame problem, but hey, >it's my problem thank you very much ... I've read and read, and can't >find the answer > >Here's a visual of it as I see it... > > > [ Serial 0 ] > [10.10.138.134] > | > [ cisco 2514 ] > | 10.10.138.221 | > [255.255.255.240] > | > [HP 224T Switch ] > | 10.10.138.220 |-----------------+ > [255.255.255.240] | > | | > | | > [ Web Servers ] [ Virtual Web Server IP Block ] > | 10.10.138.210 | | 10.10.138.225 - 10.10.138.253| > [255.255.255.240] [ Netmask: 255.255.255.224 ] > > >An outside request to our server will not make it to any server in our >virtual web server IP block -- How do I get my switch to allow traffic to >the Virtual IP block? Is it in the router? > >Thanks for taking pity on me -- ;^/ > >Eric > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message