From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr 19 14:22:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA12880
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA12751
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem09.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.39])
	by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA20343;
	Sat, 19 Apr 1997 16:23:40 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <335952AB.7303@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 16:18:03 -0700
From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
CC: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status and future of sound drivers ?
References: <5264.861481594@time.cdrom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> Yes, this much has been clear for awhile, but I thought we were
> talking about working with our current sound driver but looking
> for a suitable API target?
> 
[as I said I wasn't aware of this thread..]
It's bad manners to answer one question with another, but..
Can't we base on Linux's OSS/Free and use similar APIs? This thing of
expecting different releases for OSS/Free Linux and OSS/Free FreeBSD
keeps us in shadows for long periods of time.

	Pedro.

>                                         Jordan