From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 03:40:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 674) id BFDDA16A4CF; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:40:38 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: mlaier@vampire.homelinux.org Received: (qmail 22451 invoked by uid 1005); 13 Jun 2003 15:47:38 -0000 Delivered-To: max@vampire.homelinux.org Received: (qmail 22448 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2003 15:47:37 -0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (212.227.126.186) by p50839288.dip.t-dialin.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 2003 15:47:37 -0000 Received: from [212.227.126.163] (helo=mxng10.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19QrgG-00064H-00 for max@vampire.homelinux.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:45:36 +0200 Received: from [206.53.239.180] (helo=turing.freelists.org) by mxng10.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19QrgC-0003oe-00 for max@love2party.net; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:45:32 +0200 Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id 5F7AB391144; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:40:11 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pf4freebsd); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:40:09 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Received: from kundenserver16.yws-admin.de (unknown [217.115.154.106]) ESMTP id 8A87A390BBA for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:40:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from kasimir.com (pD951E7C8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.231.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kundenserver16.yws-admin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A2435261E for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3EE9FFA2.5000108@kasimir.com> From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org References: <009801c33194$6bb65c60$01000001@max900> In-Reply-To: <009801c33194$6bb65c60$01000001@max900> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 32 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pf4freebsd-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: pf4freebsd-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: flo@kasimir.com Precedence: normal X-list: pf4freebsd X-UID: 116 X-Length: 3243 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:55:52 +0000 Subject: [pf4freebsd] Re: Ports commited! X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Reply-To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:40:38 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:45:22 +0200 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:40:38 -0000 Hello! Max Laier wrote: > Hello, > [...] > > In the -Current branch (1.5x) a new version is almost there with a bunch of > small fixes from us and OpenBSD, just need to take care of some 5.0-issues > first. I am thinking about a pf-devel port, to provide the -current branch > in the ports-tree as well. Do you think that this is helpful, or do you > prefer tarball installation? Please tell me! I think tarball is the way to go for the pf-Current branch since it would take too long that one of the ports-committers commits the changes each time. I don't know if they want you to open a PR each time for a new version or if they will commit it if you email them. So if they would update it when you email them then we can also live with the pf-devel port i think. Just a thought... flo