Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:32:26 -0500 From: Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> To: Mark Pulford <markp@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Yonatan@xpert.com, markp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/48132: new port: log keystrokes of remote X servers Message-ID: <20030214103226.07ec814b.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> In-Reply-To: <200302141219.h1ECJwik058765@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200302141219.h1ECJwik058765@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.n?Ghn(ogmRrvc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 04:19:58 -0800 (PST) Mark Pulford <markp@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > Synopsis: new port: log keystrokes of remote X servers > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: markp > State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 14 04:19:42 PST 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed, thanks! > I guess it's a bit late to ask now, but is there any _legitimate_ use for this port? If not, do we want to encourage this sort of thing? Are ports simply committed because they compile on FreeBSD without any consideration at to the ethics of them? Just wondering. -- Cogeco ergo sum --=.n?Ghn(ogmRrvc2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+TQwRTv5Mxsi/WPMRAvPgAJ49YuLlCYcFnIrgRBWNA4vqWYH0swCdFVE5 v/JJ8APBiomV8zH8+qoIDfA= =56J+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.n?Ghn(ogmRrvc2-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030214103226.07ec814b.pnmurphy>