Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:10:53 +0100
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface
Message-ID:  <a4cf1979-baa9-0704-6e81-aecdc5f832c8@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2j2Wo5BDm2TDmcgM9fHU5AaJuF=1Rf4EfTARzdna-rUcA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <3e403eb2-b113-12d5-17c4-096ff32239e8@FreeBSD.org> <CAOtMX2j2Wo5BDm2TDmcgM9fHU5AaJuF=1Rf4EfTARzdna-rUcA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alan Somers wrote:
> It sounds like overkill, but if you put each PPPoE client in a
> separate VIMAGE jail, then each one will get a separate vnet
> interface, with distinct MACs.  They can be bridged to the same
> physical interface.

Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurations like
changing the mac address of the vlan interface and enabling promiscuous
mode on the ether interface, without success.
Could I get a different result by using the setenaddr/setautosrc control
capabilities of the ng_ether node associated to the vlan interface (and
enabling the promiscuous mode on the ether/vlan interfaces)?

-- 
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a4cf1979-baa9-0704-6e81-aecdc5f832c8>