From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 09:16:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B8E37B401; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5095C43FA3; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:16:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA19696; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:16:25 +1000 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:16:24 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030402031028.F23618@gamplex.bde.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re: #include and X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:16:30 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > ... As another argument, I wouldn't mind having > sys/mutex.h and sys/sx.h include sys/lock.h but I'm not sure bde@ would > like that. Of course I wouldn't. Esepecially sys/sx.h. Users of its interfaces need little more than the LOCK_LINE and LOCK_FILE from sys/lock.h. Bruce