Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:12:27 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_DOS2UNIX may be more powerful? Message-ID: <43E8AACB.4010406@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <b8a404110602070606s6a0df93ah@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060207003529.GA32317@hades.panopticon> <43E8A5DD.5000509@vonostingroup.com> <b8a404110602070606s6a0df93ah@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > 2006/2/7, Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com > <mailto:laszlof@vonostingroup.com>>: > > Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > > > If the idea gets accepted, I'll make patches. > > > > > > Sounds like a pretty reasonable idea. But I think USE_* is generally > just on/off switches, so maybe it needs to be a different name? > > > We already have USE_*=list. E.g. USE_GNOME, USE_RCORDER etc. > > But I think using of something like DOS2UNIX_FILES name will be better > in the case. > Thats what i was getting at. :) __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E8AACB.4010406>