From owner-freebsd-libh Mon Jul 17 3:43:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAD537B546 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 03:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA05238; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 03:44:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) To: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) Cc: libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Qt vs GTK In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:36:55 +0200." <20000717123655.A10197@cichlids.cichlids.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 03:44:01 -0700 Message-ID: <5235.963830641@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > However, since we must switch to Qt2 anyways, which has an > imcompatible API, we must change stuff anyways. > > This made me think: Hey, why do we stick to Qt? > GTK is much nicer (personal opinion) and we could use absolute > positioning. The only reason we're using Qt is because Eugene liked it. If you want to switch over to gtk, feel free. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message