From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 23 02:58:16 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9537B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 02:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C1143FBD
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 02:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4N9wDLp008063;
	Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:13 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 May 2003 11:07:28 +0200."
             <20030523110255.A78432@daneel.foundation.hs> 
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:13 +0200
Message-ID: <8062.1053683893@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gbde performance question 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 09:58:16 -0000

In message <20030523110255.A78432@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes:

>loopaes seems to beat gbde's throughput by a factor from what i hear.
>assuming that gbde is not computationally more complex by that factor, it
>would be nice to be on par :)

In all likelyhood, loopaes does more or less the same thing as "cjd" in
OpenBSD, and that won't keep your data safe for 10 years in my estimate.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.