Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:24:34 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for performance evaluation: net.isr.direct (fwd) Message-ID: <17230.56994.552228.385003@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <17229.32088.696346.868182@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <20051008143854.B84936@fledge.watson.org> <17229.29164.891534.200216@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20051012212915.E66014@fledge.watson.org> <17229.32088.696346.868182@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:17:12 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> said: > Right now, at least, it seems to work OK. I haven't tried witness, > but a non-debug kernel shows a big speedup from enabling it. Do > you think there is a chance that it could be made to work in FreeBSD? I did this ten years ago for a previous job and was able to blow out the stack very easily. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17230.56994.552228.385003>