From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 4 22:44:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA07372 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:44:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA07309 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:43:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA26897; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:43:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:43:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Forrest Aldrich cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFilter vs. IPFW In-Reply-To: <199806041956.PAA06159@drama.navinet.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > I've run across a package by Darren Reed called IPFilter. I claims to run > under BSD, and includes internal NAT support (and some other features that > IPFW doesn't, I believe). I'm wondering if anyone has used this > successfully... and what pros or cons are involved. It used to be the program to use, and can be for some situations. However ipfw has pretty much included all it's functionality, including the NAT support (in natd). Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major NOTICE: gdi.uoregon.edu is going down, please use dwhite@resnet! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message