From owner-freebsd-isp  Sun Jan 12 12:41:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA20017
          for isp-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 12:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from anshar.shadow.net (anshar.shadow.net [204.177.71.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA20012
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 12:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hyper (alam@hyper.shadow.net [204.177.71.251]) by anshar.shadow.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA25318 for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 15:46:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 15:46:37 -0500 (EST)
From: alam <alam@shadow.net>
X-Sender: alam@hyper
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: non parity ram
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970112153304.8066A-100000@hyper>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Are any of you ISP s using non parity ram in your servers ?  Have any of
you using parity ram reaped the benefits of parity ? 

Art