From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 14 07:50:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA24847 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 07:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA24841; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 07:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 07:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707141450.HAA24841@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: Pedro Giffuni Subject: Re: ports/4058: Fix for felt-3.02 Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR ports/4058; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pedro Giffuni To: Thomas Gellekum Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/4058: Fix for felt-3.02 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 09:45:19 -0700 Thomas; It does not work VERY well because the current patch-ab turns off certain buttons :(. The author recommends Xaw3d. The new patch was thought in such a way that that if someone didn't want Xaw3d, he should simply remove patch-ab from the port. I agree that Xaw3d is not very different from Xaw, and I asked the author to use Motif. I'm not really sure what the best way here is, but in any case old patch-ab must be removed. Pedro. Thomas Gellekum wrote: > > pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co writes: > > > >Description: > > felt didn't look for Xaw3d in the correct place. patch-ab was wrong, > > so I replaced it with a new patch to support Xaw3d. > > felt seems to be fine without Xaw3d. If you absolutely want Xaw3d, > move the old Xaw stuff out of the way and replace it with symlinks to > the Xaw3d headers and library. There are only very few programs in the > ports collection which really need special treatment for Xaw3d (like > print/gv), we normally don't bother about the rest. This leaves the > decision between Xaw, Xaw3d, neXtaw and Xaw95 to the user, where it > belongs, IMHO. > > tg