From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 18 16:34:42 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 16:34:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from genesis.k.pl (genesis.korbank.pl [195.117.162.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57F537B400 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ns88@localhost) by genesis.k.pl (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBJ0V4v03975; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:31:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ns88) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:31:04 +0100 From: Tomasz Paszkowski To: Pete Fritchman Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs Message-ID: <20001219013104.A59523@genesis.k.pl> References: <20001219003737.C2567@genesis.k.pl> <20001219005756.A25653@genesis.k.pl> <20001218191344.B5569@databits.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001218191344.B5569@databits.net>; from petef@databits.net on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:13:44PM -0500 Sender: ns88@genesis.k.pl Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:13:44PM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote: But by using kern.ps_showallprocs MIB you can limit information about proccess table to those entires, which are owned by caller pid. Why it can't by done with procfs ? -- _ _ _ _ _ / \ | | / / / \ / \ --- Tomasz Paszkowski ------------------------------ | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3575244866 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:59::2 === /_/ \__/ /_/ \_/ \_/ ---------------------------- ( 2B | ~ 2B ) == FF --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message