From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 9 22:55:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4087EAC993E for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mail.lafn.org (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F180D4F for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (unknown [10.0.1.12]) by mail.lafn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 548E7114C4BB; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:54:57 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:54:57 -0800 Cc: Polytropon Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:55:04 -0000 > On 7 March 2016, at 16:23, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 >=20 > What I was hoping to find was some form of informal, preliminary = version of the release notes or announcements for 10.3 and 11. I seem = to recall some sort of discussion of that back when the decision was = made to drop bind from the base. I wasn't able to find it though. I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely to = have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is most = likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg system = came out and the supporting servers were compromised. It caused me a = lot of issues. I still have one production server I can't upgrade the = ports as its setup for the temporary solution. I can't recall what I = changed and making it look like the working systems doesn't help. Thus, = I will skip 11.0 and wait for the dust from that to settle. I'll be = upgrading to 10.3 in June.