From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 03:46:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1EB511 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out6.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out6.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4583232 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:46:52 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMFAAn7c1Q6BrnK/2dsb2JhbABUB4MGgSmCNbJcAQEBAQEHml0CgRQWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQMBOj8FCwsNARMlDwUYMROINwjQVwEBAQcBAQEBHoY2hngBgwNIB4MugR8FnnmHc0COZoISgX4zMIEGI4EhAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,453,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="96025264" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([58.6.185.202]) by icp-osb-irony-out6.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2014 11:46:43 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C0198BAA; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:46:36 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:46:36 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: PORTS - possible regression in shells/lshell 0.9.16 ? Message-ID: <20141125034636.GA69979@ozzmosis.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:46:53 -0000 On Mon 2014-11-24 16:37:52 UTC+0100, Damien Fleuriot (ml@my.gd) wrote: > I'm seeing this peculiar behaviour with lshell-0.9.16 on 8-STABLE and > 10-STABLE. > > After issuing `ls' , lshell gets suspended to the background (and can be > resumed with `fg'). ... > The problem does not happen with lshell-0.9.15.1. > The problem happens on 8-STABLE and 10-STABLE. Ditto 10.1-REL but not Ubuntu 12.04, fwiw. Would seem like an upstream bug. I'd contact the author. Pinpointing the problem isn't easy with a quick glance as the sources have changed quite a bit between 0.9.15.1 & 0.9.16.