From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Thu Mar 16 09:57:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3DD0DA88 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.osipov@siemens.com) Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thoth.sbs.de", Issuer "Siemens Issuing CA Class Internet Server 2013" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9231C6B for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.osipov@siemens.com) Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2G9v2kq021000 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:57:03 +0100 Received: from DEFTHW99ERGMSX.ww902.siemens.net (defthw99ergmsx.ww902.siemens.net [139.22.70.132]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2G9ux31022997 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:57:02 +0100 Received: from DENBGAT9ERNMSX.ww902.siemens.net (139.22.70.144) by DEFTHW99ERGMSX.ww902.siemens.net (139.22.70.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:57:00 +0100 Received: from DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net ([169.254.6.192]) by DENBGAT9ERNMSX.ww902.siemens.net ([139.22.70.144]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:56:59 +0100 From: "Osipov, Michael" To: Bob Bishop CC: "freebsd-java@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Needle in the haystack: same Java code on two identical machines, one passes one fails Thread-Topic: Needle in the haystack: same Java code on two identical machines, one passes one fails Thread-Index: AdKdm2q0eGsP3SuqQcO0wrNX1weRrAAAE+wAACadAyA= Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:56:59 +0000 Message-ID: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F406@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> References: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [139.22.70.21] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:57:06 -0000 > Hi, >=20 >=20 > > On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:50, Osipov, Michael > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I am currently experiencing a stdio issue on a FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE box > at work where > > another, identical box, works flawlessly as well as other test boxes in > a VM or on real > > hardware from 9.3-STABLE to 11.0-STABLE. > > > > Let's stick to the two identical boxes at work for now, both are two > identical HPE > > servers (Xeon CPUs, RAM 4 GiB) running 10.3-STABLE, both base systems > are > > configured the same way. Software from ports installed is slightly > different. > > > > faulty box: > > FreeBSD blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 > r310805: Fri Dec 30 11:29:53 CET 2016 > root@blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN719X i386 > > > > working box: > > FreeBSD blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 > r310632: Tue Dec 27 18:58:32 CET 2016 > root@blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN714X i386 [etc] >=20 > Well at a quick look, there are changes between r310632 and r310805 that > might explain what you are seeing. Updated both machines: FreeBSD blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #2 r3153= 12: Wed Mar 15 19:59:58 CET 2017 root@blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/o= bj/usr/src/sys/BLNN719X i386 FreeBSD blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #2 r3153= 12: Wed Mar 15 19:55:39 CET 2017 root@blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/o= bj/usr/src/sys/BLNN714X i386 No avail. It was worth a try, at least.