From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 13:44:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6941065671 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062468FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from fw.publishing.hu ([82.131.181.62] helo=twoflower.in.publishing.hu) by marvin.harmless.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KJTXQ-0009MA-Lj; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:28:52 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:28:49 +0200 From: CZUCZY Gergely To: "Glen Barber" Message-ID: <20080717152849.0e90b307@twoflower.in.publishing.hu> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310807170613y6d5df98dlf85f664399c9ca4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <48750381.1030004@eskk.nu> <4ad871310807170515x5b553661yd64245f7daf2dd61@mail.gmail.com> <20080717125540.GA73950@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <4ad871310807170600of904ddvfa31f3f1bf2e421d@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310807170613y6d5df98dlf85f664399c9ca4c@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Harmless Digital X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/s9+jwSzJ/uxV3RJjdXfE.QX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New pf install on Freebsd7 seem to be a slow starter. X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:44:48 -0000 --Sig_/s9+jwSzJ/uxV3RJjdXfE.QX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:13:03 -0400 "Glen Barber" wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Glen Barber wr= ote: > > I was under the assumption the OP runs his own DNS server, as that is > > how my machine was set up. > > >=20 > Another reason I thought about 'why' the OP used tables - aren't PF > tables evaluated at boot, and macros evaluated when they are called? > I think the latter negates the need for resolving at boot. Please > correct me if I am wrong. Macros are evaluated at pfctl-time. That means, parse-time. Tables are evaluated at runtime (that means, when a lookup is in progress). --=20 =C3=9Cdv=C3=B6lettel, Czuczy Gergely Harmless Digital Bt mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu Tel: +36-30-9702963 --Sig_/s9+jwSzJ/uxV3RJjdXfE.QX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFIf0kTzrC0WyuMkpsRAmpVAJ9yTvBB1e2SCJk+3CvAteFMyTbw6gCfbgzw wed/WgLtVCEup9F0B0kPudQ= =SH1y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/s9+jwSzJ/uxV3RJjdXfE.QX--