From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:11:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20D8DBB; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjk@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37861A76; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02IB2db063220; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:11:02 GMT (envelope-from bjk@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (bjk@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r02IAvXe063206; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:11:02 GMT (envelope-from bjk@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bjk owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:10:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: auditdistd (again) Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:11:03 -0000 My recent upgrading experience led to the installkernel portion of 'make kernel' failing on the lack of an auditdistd user, for which 'mergemaster -p' was ample workaround. However, the instructions for "to rebuild everything" in UPDATING still have 'mergemaster -p' before installworld and after kernel/installkernel. There is a bug here, but it could be either a documentation bug (fix UPDATING) or a code bug (only check UID/GIDs before installworld and not installkernel, which only ever uses root:wheel). Unfortunately, testing code for the latter is somewhat time-consuming. Pawel mentioned on #bsddev that he had an untested patch for the latter. Is there interest in testing that and getting it in the tree? (Or would people prefer to just change UPDATING?) -Ben