From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Apr  1 12: 9:39 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ED5151E6
	for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Apr 1999 12:09:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com)
Received: from localhost (dan@localhost)
	by java.dpcsys.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA24492;
	Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:08:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
To: Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk>
Cc: Leif Neland <root@neland.dk>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Happy98 blocker, was Re: sendmail melissa blocker
In-Reply-To: <3703BE9D.B1F6E13F@eclipse.net.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990401120327.13180D-100000@java.dpcsys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Check out
> >     http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/procmail-security.html
> 
> Any idea what kind of overhead procmail would have on mail delivery on a
> system processing ~10k messages / day, and can it be used in the path of
> messages being relayed or is it just for local delivery?

We do anywhere from 5K to 15K messages a day.  Probably about 50/50
incoming/outgoing.  procmail only operates on incoming local
delivery.  We use a global procmailrc for things like this and
really obvious spam and most users have personal .procmailrc's too.

Don't even notice the load.  P133/64M

Dan
-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  949 443 4172
 Dana Point Communications, Inc.                            dan@dpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message