From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Apr 1 12: 9:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ED5151E6 for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:09:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA24492; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:08:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:08:25 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> To: Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk> Cc: Leif Neland <root@neland.dk>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Happy98 blocker, was Re: sendmail melissa blocker In-Reply-To: <3703BE9D.B1F6E13F@eclipse.net.uk> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990401120327.13180D-100000@java.dpcsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Check out > > http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/procmail-security.html > > Any idea what kind of overhead procmail would have on mail delivery on a > system processing ~10k messages / day, and can it be used in the path of > messages being relayed or is it just for local delivery? We do anywhere from 5K to 15K messages a day. Probably about 50/50 incoming/outgoing. procmail only operates on incoming local delivery. We use a global procmailrc for things like this and really obvious spam and most users have personal .procmailrc's too. Don't even notice the load. P133/64M Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message