From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 10 5:10: 3 2000 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 05:10:02 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF25437B400; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 05:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA27305; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:09:57 +1100 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:11:18 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: John Baldwin Cc: atrens@nortel.ca, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: possibly related data point - (was) Re: Current Broken! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > On 08-Dec-00 atrens@nortel.ca wrote: > > > > John, > > > > I'm not a constraints expert either, but I noticed that when I try to > > build a kernel WITHOUT any optimization, I get a failure in > > > > /usr/src/sys/i386/atomic.h . > > Compiling a kernel with anything but -O for optimization is not supported. gcc > has produced buggy code for the -O0 case in the past. -O0 (or plain cc without -O) is supposed to work, but no one cares enough about it to fix it every day. Fixing has been pending for many days now. My oldest saved mail about it is dated 21 July 2000, but ISTR discussing it last year. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message