From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:35:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1386B1065673; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF58FC13; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobh064552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:26 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 wrote: > 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : >> Hello, Freebsd-embedded. >>=20 >> Does somebody work on NanoBSD? It was not MFCed for long time on one >> hand, and on other hand, support of NANO_LABEL, added to CURRENT, is = completely >> broken and almost useless. >>=20 >=20 > Hi Lev, >=20 > I'm using the NANO_LABEL support, and I didn't have any problem. > What's your label problem with nanobsd precisely ? I'd like to know the problem as well since FreeNAS uses it without any = problems at all. I don't believe "completely broken" based on my = first-hand experience, so maybe a better description of the problem = would help me fix it. Warner