Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Dec 2017 20:03:37 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r326731 - head/sys/ufs/ffs
Message-ID:  <a1d303b4-14b8-6a3d-3648-96a69bed7144@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201712091544.vB9FiVUI096790@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201712091544.vB9FiVUI096790@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/12/2017 17:44, Mark Johnston wrote:
> Some GEOMs do not appear to handle BIO_ORDERED correctly, meaning that the

Nitpick: this should be "geoms" or, even better, "GEOM classes" :-)

> barrier write may not work as intended.
Could the loss of BIO_ORDERED in g_duplicate_bio() contribute to the problem
with those GEOM classes?

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a1d303b4-14b8-6a3d-3648-96a69bed7144>