From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 25 11:57:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBD21150B01 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF0480B10; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (dslb-090-186-131-085.090.186.pools.vodafone-ip.de [90.186.131.85]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 432pSs5R1GzC5vT; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:57:33 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\)) Subject: Re: ssl=base From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:57:33 +0100 Cc: Mathieu Arnold , FreeBSD Mailing List , portmgr@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6a506622-f08b-3e52-52c4-3eb63147c328@grosbein.net> <20181125114601.b56stbs5nr64mhkv@atuin.in.mat.cc> To: Eugene Grosbein X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8CF0480B10 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[lastsummer.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.969,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[85.131.186.90.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.25)[ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-3.45), asn: 24940(-2.79), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:57:37 -0000 > On 25. Nov 2018, at 12:51 PM, Eugene Grosbein = wrote: >=20 > Why can't you use LibreSSL port for some ports and base libssl for = other ports? > That is, net/mpd5 links with base system libfetch that depends on base = libssl, > so it is example of port that cannot be built with LibreSSL. FWIW, since 2015 we've had no build or operational issue with mpd5 for = LibreSSL from ports. If the issue is mixed linkling between base and ports, it's not that = LibreSSL fails but rather any combination of base and ports, on FreeBSD 12 even = between 1.1.1 and 1.0.2. On 11 that wasn't really an issue because base OpenSSL = and ports OpenSSL were the same so I can understand where the the idea of = "breakage" for LibreSSL specifically comes from. Cheers, Franco