From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jun 3 18:36:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat193.72.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.193.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686C114E2E; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:36:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA51941; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 22:36:39 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 22:36:39 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Eivind Eklund Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun Spurs Innovation in Supercomputing In-Reply-To: <19990603161902.A76949@bitbox.follo.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 12:31:52AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > Just in case nobody has seen this yet...not sure how/if we can use this... > > > > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990602/ca_sun_mic_1.html > > I looked it over; it does not seem particularly useful. > > The single thing I think would be most useful in bringing FreeBSD up > as a high availability cluster platform would be to repeat Simon's > (proprietary, due to choices that were not his to make) work on > integrating a distributed lock manager in PostgreSQL. I have the lock > manager code (which I hope to integrate in FreeBSD when I get time to > bug bde about what the problems he was handwaving about actually are), > but not the PostgreSQL mods. I'm curious here...what mods to PostgreSQL? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message