From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 20:37:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4D216A41C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB8943D1D for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F2D2513C0; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:37:52 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050526203752.GA28228@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050526194137.GB50503@keyslapper.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050526194137.GB50503@keyslapper.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: 5.3->5.4 upgrade method X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:37:04 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:41:38PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Ok, I've settled on upgrading to 5.4 (from 5.4 RELEASE) but I can't > find an explicit statement that performing such an upgrade with > cvsup/buildworld/buildkernel, etc. would be ok. No kernel config > gotchas mentioned either. Of course it seems implied that this would > be a perfectly fine way to do the upgrade. >=20 > Has anyone else used this upgrade method going from 5.3 to 5.4? > Any caveats on the kernel config? Yes, it's fine as long as you precisely follow the upgrade method (see handbook and UPDATING). Kris --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCljOgWry0BWjoQKURAiepAKCxVXUoXlmRS94vWTUHxBc/5LQXIgCfdNo2 h65fPunpwc/Bxpkz4gVpCNs= =S/N2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--