Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:00:36 GMT From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums Message-ID: <200511231700.jANH0ag9072433@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/89415; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: vd@datamax.bg Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:51:58 +0100 --=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vasil Dimov p=ED=B9e v st 23. 11. 2005 v 18:48 +0200: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:10:33PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > How does this cope with the maintainer approvals? Lot of those ports ar= e > > owned by someone. I don't think there's a general clearance to bypass > > maintainers on this change. > >=20 >=20 > Well, I filled this PR, thinking that no explicit maintainers' approval > is needed for this change. This my thought is based on the relevant > "SHA256 checksums" discussion on ports@ and on your unambiguous request: >=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-November/027258.htm= l : >=20 > --- cut --- > > A diff from my ports dir can be found at: > > http://vdev.datamax.bg/tmp/ports_sha256.diff.gz > > (655 distfiles available) >=20 > Please send-pr it, otherwise it will almost certainly get lost. I was somehow under impression that the patch touched only yours and unmaintained ports. > I think asking portmgr for approval is the best choise for this PR. Probably. > Otherwise the diff must be split into small diffs for each maintainer's > ports and somehow (flood the PR database with 600+ PRs?) ask for approval= . > This sounds really horrible and thoughtless. Awwww. > Other solution is to leave the things as they are and use the widespread > "do nothing" strategy :-) After all there are more important things to > bother with, than the SHA256 sums. Sounds best. Also, could your tool be tailored to insert the lines to distinfo where 'make makesum' would insert them, not on the end? --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> Nazgul have poisoned your lembas. --=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDhJ4untdYP8FOsoIRAu8tAKCbZFpgjWsJUXxsfKQmlY1dj5iRFwCfQ7fy oA2DJm/ETioKhE/2mbsaSjA= =srlE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511231700.jANH0ag9072433>