From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  2 12:12:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8441C16A41F;
	Mon,  2 Jan 2006 12:12:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org)
Received: from www235.sakura.ne.jp (www235.sakura.ne.jp [202.181.97.45])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334DD43D53;
	Mon,  2 Jan 2006 12:12:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org)
Received: from [192.168.11.12] (61-26-245-137.rev.home.ne.jp [61.26.245.137])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by www235.sakura.ne.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k02CCNPD001881
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:12:29 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org)
Message-ID: <43B918A8.5010908@lovepeers.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:12:24 +0900
From: KOMATSU Shinichiro <koma2@lovepeers.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
References: <200601011543.k01Fhat3076426@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060101191016.5efae084@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060101191016.5efae084@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cronopios@gmail.com,
	Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:12:35 -0000

Hello,

Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
> Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>  (5) The frequency of INDEX generation on official site is now
>>sufficient, recommend to run "portsdb -F" (fetch INDEX from official
>>site) instead of "portsdb -U" (make INDEX by yourself) in portsdb(1).
>>[1] 
> 
> 
>>  PR:             ports/91164
>>  Submitted by:   KOMATSU Shinichiro <koma2@lovepeers.org>
>>(maintainer) Pointed out by: Enrique Matias <cronopios at gmail dot
>>com> [1]
> 
> 
> This is a very bad idea; locally generated INDEX contains all
> use-defined OPTIONS, etc. while the fetched one contains only the
> defaults thus his has the potential to break the wonderful
> upward-recursive usage of portupgrade.

In the man page of portsdb(1), I wrote as follows:

      -U
      --updateindex  Update or create the INDEX file by running ``make index''.
                     If you define special macros in /etc/make.conf and
                     the dependency of some ports are changed, you should create
                     INDEX by yourself by using this option. Otherwise, using
                     -F option is recommended since it is much faster.

I forgot to mention OPTIONS, so I will add in the next release.
I hope this sentence would satisfy you.