From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May 23  6: 9:26 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FF7837B7DC; Tue, 23 May 2000 06:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA95453;
	Tue, 23 May 2000 17:09:21 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 17:09:19 +0400
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: jdp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Detecting multiply function definitions
Message-ID: <20000523170918.A95436@nagual.pp.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Organization: Biomechanoid
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Why our ld is able to detect multiply defined functions only for static
linking? What prevents us to use the same algorithm for shared linking
too? It is very unsafe otherwise to do shared linking...

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nagual.pp.ru>
http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message