Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:22:23 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl port to select in make.conf Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309031219140.34234@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130902232307.44084afd@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309012229460.76768@woozle.rinet.ru> <52238D66.4020908@passap.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309012301040.76768@woozle.rinet.ru> <20130902232307.44084afd@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, RW wrote: > > > > which variable should be defined in make.conf to switch from > > > > current 5.14 to, say, 5.16 (for poudriere package building)? > > > > > > > > Naive > > > > > > > > PERL_VER=5.16 > > > > > > > > does not seem to work, and I want to not chase minor version > > > > changes. > > > > > > I use PERL_VERSION=5.16.3. > > > > It definitely works, but will stop with 5.16 upgrade; that is the > > situation to avoid. > > If you mean it will stop 5.16.3 being upgraded to 5.16.4, it wont > (unless there's something specific in the way poudriere handles perl). > > When you install perl (as part of an upgrade or as a dependency) it > writes the new PERL_VERSION into make.conf. Well, all would go well unless it was a *special* make.conf used for poudriere bulk building instead of system one. Well, possibly I should use 'could stop' instead of definitively-looking 'will stop' BTW, are there any special place where poudriere usage should be discussed? Thanks! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1309031219140.34234>