From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 15:27:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA0937B401; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE7C43F85; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:27:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 6175151A6F; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:57:42 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:57:42 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20030327232742.GA80113@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030326225530.G2075@odysseus.silby.com> <20030327180247.D1825@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030327180247.D1825@gamplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-37.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Silbersack cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: Checksum/copy (was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:27:49 -0000 --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 27 March 2003 at 19:07:15 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: >> On my Mobile Celeron, a for (i = 0; i < max; i++) array[i]=0 runs >> faster than bzero. :( > > Saved data from my benchmarks show that bzero (stosl) was OK on > 486's, poor on original Pentiums, OK on K6-1's, best by far on > second generation Celerons (ones like PII) and poor on Athlon XP's > (but not as relatively bad as on original Pentiums). What happened to i686_bzero? I was sure that years ago one existed, but now all machines I use (i686 class) all use generic_bzero. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+g4juIubykFB6QiMRAplxAKCTS04sQ0iuGkMAtimcijE9X+dJ7wCfXXVO TlakzRPdXai1N99jg9ZGTeo= =Dxlr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--