Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:37:16 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>, Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of route command Message-ID: <20070917123715.GB2648@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <262949390709170313t649a40d2n5b0598a8bcc034a7@mail.gmail.com> <46EE4CC8.4000906@tomjudge.com> References: <20070910115636.GA8326@kobe.laptop> <46EE4CC8.4000906@tomjudge.com> <262949390709170313t649a40d2n5b0598a8bcc034a7@mail.gmail.com> <46E11515.8090007@tomjudge.com> <46E174DB.8070004@FreeBSD.org> <20070907185757.GA25624@kobe.laptop> <262949390709091803s507265e6mf3929c4dd26ecc56@mail.gmail.com> <20070910110528.GB2476@kobe.laptop> <20070910115636.GA8326@kobe.laptop> <46EE4CC8.4000906@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-09-17 10:45, Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Tom Judge wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers >>>>>>> today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange >>>>>>> behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than >>>>>>> adding 128.0.0.0/8 it would add 0.0.0.0/8, however adding 10/9 works >>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this a bug in route or the routing table? >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Can you take a look at this patch, please? >>>> >>>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2007-09/msg00000.html >>> >>> Fantastic, thanks for the pointer! :-) > > Is there any chance of getting this commited, or should I raise a PR > about this? I'm not an src-committer, so we have to get an approval from Bruce first, but the patch is saved in my online patch queue: http://hg.hellug.gr/freebsd/src-keramida/file/08d313afdc9a/ The patch is the file called 'route'. On 2007-09-17 11:13, Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, there's also a fix for netstat to print CIDR network addresses correctly: > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/submit/2007-09/msg00005.html Neat, yeah I noticed that too, while looking at the threads about route/netstat. I just came back from a trip and I will have some time to see how much of it applies to FreeBSD's netstat too. Thanks once more :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070917123715.GB2648>