Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
To:        "Brooks Davis" <brooks@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How to prevent use of clang && llvm?
Message-ID:  <aafe27faeafe92dda3e65c690cdc1620.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140226000421.GA80747@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
References:  <47ae4e8ed445c7e6fc46796d46b9a928.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20140226000421.GA80747@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:31:56PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>  I'm in the process of performing an upgrade, and ran a preliminary check
>> to see what would be performed. During the process I encountered a
>> dialog(1) for both clang, and llvm3. It was for textproc/clucene. Which
>> wants devel/boost-libs, which depends on devel/boost-jam. I didn't require
>> clang, or llvm3 with the initial install of textproc/clucene (that I can see/recall).
>> But am presented with the dialog this time. I have WITHOUT_CLANG=true
>> in /etc/src.conf. Do I need to also add it to /etc/make.conf? Anything else?
>
> It looks like this is because boots requires a C++11 compiler and the
> default C++11 compiler is clang.  From reading the source I deduce that
> FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc in your make.conf may achieve the effect you
> require.

You rock!
I Really appreciate your taking the time to help.

--Chris

>
> -- Brooks
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aafe27faeafe92dda3e65c690cdc1620.authenticated>