From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 25 21:48:03 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0FE151;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAFD2C13;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so3672325lbj.5
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:48:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
 bh=B+1Dd4rMAawpwvbnBkgXiPJNn4UoU7PaEi3X4zYH2as=;
 b=UEBjcLuLwpOkDD9xDJjqe7wg/a9hlvHVK18SXvuXsL6H5iBdSNp6zJo1KQTm3/0oFP
 qFDMAZJtczA+dRYLJhFTdNB771lxfhLRjlbOLVWiWfRZ73uHrmKvuN2QMG3sMvDsm/aj
 +1T3Mv0b9stVpXLXC9uE34f5+KlNljyDLunWRwvvNNVLbyxv44nuW7Q5r78dTy5qrd+y
 VijNEcLy76jD9rQZXE1I2W4umyDlNoHljoDMOodSbuGIGrdwDXza1Ivh/SbGgRVQkaVy
 494tNxyZNAM28wnxbrcWl6XeUAjQXDw9FjUPsmYOHbLqzAUUwTF8ZC0ul0G41mzMHrwW
 V9hA==
X-Received: by 10.152.22.4 with SMTP id z4mr24163734lae.14.1385416081161;
 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id go4sm39417128lbc.3.2013.11.25.13.47.59
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:47:58 +0200
From: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Hast locking up under 9.2
Message-ID: <20131125214757.GB6870@gmail.com>
References: <20131125094111.GA22396@gmail.com>
 <E1VkvTD-000KvV-2b@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1VkvTD-000KvV-2b@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:48:03 -0000

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:40:55PM +0000, Pete French wrote:
> Hi, I should be able to make some time today to test a patch
> if you would like me to. From following the thread I get
> the idea this bug only applies to memsync mode, is that right ? That
> would fit with my observations.

Yes, this is the fix for memsync mode, but testing any mode is
appreciated to be sure no regression has been introduced.

-- 
Mikolaj Golub