From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 17:35:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0570916A4CF for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:35:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BF643D39 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:35:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E6F7A425; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <41812DE7.7020908@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:35:35 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "George V. Neville-Neil" References: <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org> <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:35:40 -0000 George V. Neville-Neil wrote: >At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:52:33 -0700, >Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > >>On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:28:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> >>>>It annoys me that we have to resort to BPF to send IP datagrams on >>>>unnumbered interfaces. Here is a half baked idea. Please look and >>>>tell me what you think. >>>> >>>> >>>I've sent lots of datagrams on un-numberred interfaces using netgraph.. >>> >>> >>I should qualify my post a bit more: I began thinking along these lines >>with the intention of enabling ISC dhcp (and dhclient) to be compiled >>without using bpf support. I don't have the time or interest to port ISC >>dhcp to use netgraph, but I'd be interested to see the results if that >>happened. >> >> >> > >Just one quick question. Does the use of this option require root >privilege? I think it should :-) > netgraph requires root privs to set up a graph.. > >Later, >George >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >