From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 13:57:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E75C1065670 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19358FC3C for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so775092rne.12 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=ixg4PlkT2Cf1H/PxB9KPUnpPlfT8Bi5i4mymm2qSnug=; b=RQLA0AKojqdyHEFxS5FQsGQBhvJy7w4/HWSj/KmRoAlzFOLK+girS44h47ZHhdtc7n BZTSMVIIF79X7xVxC/JRzosFT8W70bLLjFnrf/0EFw3S+UdN7D8lvEeV2ivWoxxdnHoq HOgRQAv3ojp7/43cFPfL+dodOEcXz/UYO5nK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=GEuKaycXjN0POuOLA15vOjBtM2kIX1IAy6WMAeC8ZH6Yg7Ae7zXVYaaFnwrYpnNSRy mUvGjSVVve/USQgO4c5GvowbnKPapC/lww7bXkDj7DtQrW0H0YJHlSdU0mb4/egkCm42 m1OI4aY3NmdFvKy+jvgQoTk9/kRCqOMUiCk04= Received: by 10.150.220.19 with SMTP id s19mr2044890ybg.217.1224943033585; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (c-24-62-106-68.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.106.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o29sm2152415elf.3.2008.10.25.06.57.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:57:07 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: "Alexander Sack" Message-ID: <20081025095707.5226d663@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <3c0b01820810250549r6c1f5614i27709c09d73a2018@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c0b01820810231731s1b4d4659j7d1df8bf4abb229c@mail.gmail.com> <20081024104232.X21603@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081024125059.GE1137@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200810250958.15130.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <3c0b01820810250549r6c1f5614i27709c09d73a2018@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: Daniel O'Connor , Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does adding /usr/lib32 to LD_LIBRARY_PATH break 64-bit binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:57:15 -0000 --Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:49:19 -0400 "Alexander Sack" wrote: >=20 > Is this a bug or not in FreeBSD's rtld? >=20 > -aps It is not. In case it was not clear before, I maintain that you _ask_ rtld for wrong behaviour and you get back what you asked for, down to the letter. 'Tasting' libraries just because someone somewhere want to screw up their configuration does not seem right to me at all. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFJAyWzQ6z1jMm+XZYRAsLcAJ94HFDpsdXLEFu6tM1HTaehE2etPACgiZ79 qRODaSlnqzoO4FYfPJNwoQQ= =ADcG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2CvL_Ijs54QK/nIFimt1iHp--