Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:53:01 -0900 From: Brian Raynes <brian_raynes@dnr.state.ak.us> To: Anthony Atkielski <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Prevalence of FreeBSD and UNIX among servers Message-ID: <3C0D6FED.59E16F2B@dnr.state.ak.us> References: <20011205095150.M16840-100000@marbles.lost.net.au> <018c01c17d25$338cec20$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Tim writes: > > > Samba doesn't emulate anything. It's a perfectly > > usable implementation of SMB, aka CIFS. > > What about NT domain credentials, permissions, and ACLs? There's been work at implementing some of this in Samba - you'd have to check their website for the latest, it's been a while since I looked. We use Samba on Solaris at my very large State office. As a user I do not miss anything. There used to be a NT authentication server, but the admins who inherited it, dumped it. The only Win2K servers we have are for specific apps that do not run under Solaris. Either way, _users_ don't notice any difference, maybe admins do? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C0D6FED.59E16F2B>