From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 19:40:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A2AD1D54; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09DA2AF1; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id fupea9y78jlcgfupfaNGTI; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:40:44 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=FIq7v7cs c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=SiCb4R4ik8FkIQoqTdIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0335813753; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2FJefek069489; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201603151940.u2FJefek069489@slippy.cwsent.com> Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Olli Hauer cc: Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r411147 - head In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:49:11 +0100." <56E84B17.3070809@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <69487.1458070841.1@slippy> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:40:41 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDg/HJ0vRXrVpa93pdunbeHUhb97roaOUoaBbnlGFccupXvCTL+WMbQ90zf84eBccRDqlFwyhpFmUHhTVO5ofx9UemLIVmLsH2AEPrI0SVhGXMB6ThMS Zev9eO4FmLIzPdK7gG6+gYNe7+gwALhcle83A1Y222LlliIdj+XsWn//DuVAyaSkaaUEggF9TtgIEQwNsSiDrkNHzxF3CGPyKQEKlD1O/FmweTZiOeWlAt/w Tn4qvb8jLOZx+QpgXaRbm6GQNz5kCKS+z3LpA0KV+Lg2HMqX0GJGFvtLYKKfQZba X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:40:52 -0000 In message <56E84B17.3070809@gmx.de>, olli hauer writes: > On 2016-03-15 14:39, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <201603151031.u2FAVrif078706@repo.freebsd.org>, Olli Hauer = > > writes: > >> Author: ohauer > >> Date: Tue Mar 15 10:31:53 2016 > >> New Revision: 411147 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411147 > >> > >> Log: > >> - add note for VDA users how to stay on postfix-2.11.x > > = > > Would it not be a good idea to also keep the legacy version of postfix= in = > > the tree for a while? Possibly deprecating it with a best before date? > > = > = > Is there a special requirement for postfix-3.0.x? > = > At the moment we have 3 versions (+ additional ${port}-sasl) in the tree= : > postfix-2.11.7 -> mail/postfix211 > postfix-3.1.0 -> mail/postfix > postfix-3.2.20160314 -> mail/postfix-current > = > Postfix 2.8 was the last official supported version for VDA but the VDA = patch also works with > 2.11.x > = > 2.11.7 is at the moment the last version from the 2.x line and I don't p= lan to remove it unti > l it is no longer supported by Wietse (I suspect at last one or more yea= rs) > = > I really don't see the need to keep an additional postfix-3.0.x (legacy)= port in the tree, bu > t if there are good arguments I can change my mind ;) You're probably right here.