From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  2 20:10:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCB216A403;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:10:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marcelo@registro.br)
Received: from clone.registro.br (clone.registro.br [200.160.2.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C735C43D45;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:10:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marcelo@registro.br)
Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1014)
	id 2E5B22A4FD; Mon,  2 Oct 2006 17:10:43 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:10:43 -0300
From: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral <marcelo@registro.br>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20061002201043.GH62729@registro.br>
References: <2a41acea0608301145j7bbed961j33ce903a27d8963d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060904130827.GE12975@registro.br>
	<20060911195521.GD63300@registro.br>
	<20060913182019.R50147@fledge.watson.org>
	<20060913182457.W50147@fledge.watson.org>
	<20060914175049.GH49126@registro.br> <450A2A6E.3040408@yandex.ru>
	<20060915145120.GA93074@registro.br>
	<20060915223211.R65248@odysseus.silby.com>
	<20060918133038.GG6701@registro.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060918133038.GG6701@registro.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DNS query performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:10:45 -0000

Does anybody have some news about this thread? Nowadays I prefer to
use 4.11 until I can solve all the issues but its end-of-life is near
and I'm worried.

Thanks,
Marcelo


On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:30:38AM -0300, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
> 
> Hello Mike,
> 
> > Although it sounds silly, could you try recompiling 6.1 and 7.0 with a 
> > non-SMP kernel and see how they perform?  That would at least tell us if 
> > it's a general performance problem in 6.x and 7.x, or if SMP is somehow 
> > hurting performance in this case.
> 
> I have this numbers spread over my e-mails. Just putting they together:
> 
> 
> OS			q/s
> ---			---
> 
> FreeBSD 6.1 SMP		14953
> 
> FreeBSD 6.1 UP     	15516
> 
> FreeBSD 7.x SMP    	15323
> 
> FreeBSD 7.x UP     	16200
> 
> 
> FreeBSD 4.11 SMP   	34977
> 
> FreeBSD 4.11 UP    	33926
> 
> 
> I think is a general problem in 6.x and 7.x. UP kernel is always a
> little bit better, but I can't see big changes tweaking from SMP to
> UP.
> 
> On the other hand, with the same hardware, 4.11 is twice better in
> performance.
> 
> -- 
> Att.,
> 
> Marcelo Gardini
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"