From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 30 11:48:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F5916A41F
	for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:48:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5910843D48
	for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:48:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 62518 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 11:48:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.5?) (192.168.2.5)
	by andxor.it with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 11:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4314476F.2070903@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:47:59 +0200
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050829)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pav@FreeBSD.org
References: <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: abandoning jade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:48:03 -0000

Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Why we do still stick with jade, when better faster happier openjade is
> available?

Really dunno.

> If it's purely historical sentiment, isn't it time for a
> global switch to openjade?

I agree.

--
Alex Dupre