From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 23 15:50:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from isris.pair.com (isris.pair.com [209.68.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4847A37B4C5 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9338 invoked by uid 3130); 23 Oct 2000 22:50:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20001023185045.C29365@electricjellyfish.net> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:50:45 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: ; from Alexey Dokuchaev on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:26:07AM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:26:07AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > >Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new" > > >startup layout, say, somewhere at the installation stage. > > > > Well if you're that stubborn there's no reason that the "new" layout > > could not be compiled into a monolithic script. In fact perhaps you > > could be the one to step forward and write the code to compile that > > script. ;-) > > That's an idea! Gotta co recent -CURRENT right now! might want to port the netbsd code first, since AFAIK this stuff isn't in current ;-) i imagine it won't take much though... just tweaking the scripts to make sure they all do the right thing on a FreeBSD box. and it seems like compiling a monolithic script should be simple enough... maybe i'll look at it in my copious spare time... -- garrett rooney my pid is inigo montoya. rooneg@electricjellyfish.net you kill -9 my parent process. http://electricjellyfish.net/ prepare to vi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message